Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2003 20:19:08 -0700 (PDT) From: Tom Samplonius <tom@sdf.com> To: Daniel Eischen <eischen@pcnet.com> Cc: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: Native JDK with libthr/libkse Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.05.10306022015260.24448-100000@misery.sdf.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.10.10306021920550.17389-100000@pcnet5.pcnet.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 2 Jun 2003, Daniel Eischen wrote: > On Mon, 2 Jun 2003, Tom Samplonius wrote: > > ... > > > And I encourage the java developers to let us threads guys know > > > what they're having problems with. It has been stated that > > > jdk is not guaranteed to work with anything but libc_r, so > > > contact us over at threads@. We want to see a fast and stable > > > jdk as much as anyone else does. > > > > > > -- > > > Dan Eischen > > > > > > But the last that I've seen on the threads@ list is that libkse's signal > > handling is not finished, and both libthr and libkse have incomplete SMP > > support. I've been waiting to hear whether one of these has reached a > > "finished" state, in order that a test build of jdk on FreeBSD 5 is not a > > total waste... > > SMP libkse support should be complete. We are working on signal > handling now, but it's fudged to mostly work. Mozilla, KDE, > and openoffice all run with libkse. Does "fudged" mean that the issue MySQL not exiting has also been resolved? That seems like something that would break a java application real fast. Also at what point was support completed? I'm not sure if I need to cvsup again. I last cvsupped -current on May 31st. Would that be the latest and greatest libkse? > -- > Dan Eischen Tom
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.05.10306022015260.24448-100000>