Date: Thu, 02 May 2013 16:22:41 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?xYF1a2FzeiBXxIVzaWtvd3NraQ==?= <lukasz@wasikowski.net> To: Oliver Heesakkers <freebsd@heesakkers.info> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [BRAINSTORM] shebang fixing framework Message-ID: <518276B1.80000@wasikowski.net> In-Reply-To: <1786370.b1sXK5t6Pv@pcoliver.heesakkers.info> References: <20130430103821.GJ3577@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <1786370.b1sXK5t6Pv@pcoliver.heesakkers.info>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
W dniu 2013-05-01 21:18, Oliver Heesakkers pisze: > Op di 30 apr 2013 12:38:21 schreef Baptiste Daroussin: >> For a while now: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/51152 we >> are looking for a framework/helpers to help patching scripts shebang so >> that they fit where the interpreters is on FreeBSD. >> > (...) > > In there you wrote a patch using /usr/bin/env. Why not stick with that? I'm > quite fond of this technique as it's clean and portable. > > Portability might not be that important when working on a fix for ports alone, > but still makes sense to me. /usr/bin/env is not good in all the situation. Look at www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=177481 - /usr/bin/env is not working when using 'service' to start daemons. We should change PATH used by 'service' to include /usr/local/bin and /usr/local/sbin or stop using /usr/bin/env to start rc.d scripts. -- best regards, Lukasz Wasikowski
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?518276B1.80000>