Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
In-Reply-To: <ZloQ5HpJa27AWVP4@spindle.one-eyed-alien.net>

| previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, May 31, 2024 at 06:03:16PM +0000, Brooks Davis wrote:
B> > Author:     Dmitry Lukhtionov <dmitryluhtionov@gmail.com>
B> > AuthorDate: 2024-05-31 16:19:54 +0000
B> > Commit:     Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@FreeBSD.org>
B> > CommitDate: 2024-05-31 16:19:54 +0000
B> > 
B> >     netgraph: provide separate malloc type for nodes that are missing it
B> >     
B> >     The kernel option NG_SEPARATE_MALLOC helps to debug memory leaks in
B> >     netgraph(4).  Several nodes were missing the support.
B> 
B> I realize this commit didn't create the option, but is there really
B> enough of a cost to having multiple malloc types to justify an option at
B> all?

This is just how it has been since early days of netgraph, and it makes
some missing nodes to honor the flag, thus I just accepted the
submission.

I have no objection if afedorov@ or anybody else takes a more thoughful
evaluation and changes that.

-- 
Gleb Smirnoff



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?>