Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2003 14:20:21 -0500 From: "Louis A. Mamakos" <louie@TransSys.COM> To: Matthias Andree <ma+fscsi@dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de> Cc: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Ultra 160 - what HA works well with 4.9 and 5-CURRENT? Message-ID: <200311041920.hA4JKLIg086943@whizzo.transsys.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 04 Nov 2003 11:53:19 %2B0100." <20031104105319.GB9585@merlin.emma.line.org> References: <20031104105319.GB9585@merlin.emma.line.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I have an Adaptec 29160B in a Dell 1U server appliance I picked up used that seems to work very reliably. And it's pretty quick, compared to the Ultra2 stuff I'm used to using. I have no experience with the other controllers you mentioned louie >From dmesg, under 4.9 stable ahc0: <Adaptec 29160B Ultra160 SCSI adapter> port 0xe800-0xe8ff mem 0xfebfb000-0xfebfbfff irq 10 at device 15.0 on pci0 aic7892: Ultra160 Wide Channel A, SCSI Id=7, 32/253 SCBs da0 at ahc0 bus 0 target 0 lun 0 da0: <QUANTUM ATLAS V 9 WLS 0201> Fixed Direct Access SCSI-3 device da0: 160.000MB/s transfers (80.000MHz, offset 63, 16bit), Tagged Queueing Enabled da0: 8683MB (17783249 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 1106C) da1 at ahc0 bus 0 target 1 lun 0 da1: <QUANTUM ATLAS V 9 WLS 0201> Fixed Direct Access SCSI-3 device da1: 160.000MB/s transfers (80.000MHz, offset 63, 16bit), Tagged Queueing Enabled da1: 8683MB (17783249 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 1106C)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200311041920.hA4JKLIg086943>