Date: Fri, 08 May 2009 18:20:53 +0300 From: Andriy Gapon <avg@icyb.net.ua> To: Robert Noland <rnoland@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Ashish SHUKLA <wahjava@gmail.com>, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: split xcbgen from xcb-proto Message-ID: <4A044DD5.8030209@icyb.net.ua> In-Reply-To: <1241795208.1733.8.camel@balrog.2hip.net> References: <4A01C995.1080808@icyb.net.ua> <86hbzwvzsd.fsf@chateau.d.lf> <4A03F50B.6050908@icyb.net.ua> <86tz3v6d44.fsf@chateau.d.lf> <4A0430F6.4080202@icyb.net.ua> <1241795208.1733.8.camel@balrog.2hip.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
on 08/05/2009 18:06 Robert Noland said the following: > > I think that a slave port is ok in this case. As long as dependencies > can be cleanly tracked and it doesn't produce conflicts. Meaning that > the user shouldn't have to select one port over the other. Right. One port should complement the other, not be its alternative. -- Andriy Gapon
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4A044DD5.8030209>