Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2014 14:28:22 -0400 From: Thomas Hoffmann <trh411@gmail.com> To: FreeBSD Mailing List <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Cc: Tim Daneliuk <tundra@tundraware.com> Subject: Re: Does openssl Fix Bump The Version Number? Message-ID: <CAB7-odn8ePOm=Ub9H9N8aaUMidf5OPByBAUrLwro6YSbeJmtpg@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <53454F42.8070003@tundraware.com> References: <53454EFA.3040207@tundraware.com> <53454F42.8070003@tundraware.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 9:46 AM, Tim Daneliuk <tundra@tundraware.com> wrote: > On 04/09/2014 08:45 AM, Tim Daneliuk wrote: > >> I did a source tree update to 264294 and then a build world/kernel >> followed >> by install/reboot. But I still see this: >> >> >> [root] fuzzball ~>openssl version >> OpenSSL 1.0.1e-freebsd 11 Feb 2013 >> >> >> So ... it the version number supposed to be getting bumped or am I simply >> not really patched ... and why.... >> >> > I should mention this is 10-STABLE amd64 >From what I can see, the patch has not been MFC'd to 10-STABLE, since on a freshly checked out working copy r264302 I see in /usr/src/crypto/openssl/CHANGES: Changes between 1.0.1d and 1.0.1e [11 Feb 2013] whereas in my -CURRENT r264289 amd64 I see: Changes between 1.0.1f and 1.0.1g [7 Apr 2014] and as expected I get: # openssl version OpenSSL 1.0.1g-freebsd 7 Apr 2014 -Tom
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAB7-odn8ePOm=Ub9H9N8aaUMidf5OPByBAUrLwro6YSbeJmtpg>