Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2001 18:35:34 +1000 (EST) From: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> To: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven <asmodai@FreeBSD.org> Subject: RE: cvs commit: src/usr.bin/xlint/llib Makefile Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0104251832190.22854-100000@besplex.bde.org> In-Reply-To: <XFMail.010425011303.jhb@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 25 Apr 2001, John Baldwin wrote: > >> You should just be able to use the 'lint' in your path since that should map > >> to > >> the 'lint' program in the build-tools. > > > > Not quite. `lint' is just the driver stage. It has hard-coded paths > > to /usr/libexec/lint[1-2], so the new version of lint mostly doesn't > > get used whether or not `lint' is run from the obj dir or according > > to the path. > > Ugh, gross. I guess the bootstrap version of lint will need to be hacked > somehow to use bootstrap verisons of those? Ugh. The clean way, or at least the usual way, is to have an enviroment variable like gcc's COMPILER_PATH. Bruce To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0104251832190.22854-100000>