Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      25 Feb 1998 10:52:34 -0600
From:      Dave Marquardt <marquard@zilker.net>
To:        freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Token Ring
Message-ID:  <851zwr39v1.fsf@localhost.zilker.net>
In-Reply-To: Bill/Carolyn Pechter's message of "Wed, 25 Feb 1998 11:14:27 -0500 (EST)"
References:  <199802251614.LAA17104@shell.monmouth.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Bill/Carolyn Pechter <pechter@shell.monmouth.com> writes:
> Which is why I ran Linux while inside IBM and FreeBSD elsewhere.
> Token Ring is needed for many environments.  Johnson & Johnson's running
> Token Ring, most mainframe shops with IBM are Token Ring, just as most
> DEC and other mini shops went ethernet.

I run FreeBSD inside IBM and at home, and use RS/6000s to gateway to
token ring.

> I think FreeBSD should consider expanding its support in this area.
> FreeBSD should look at itself as a great legacy gateway.

Well, "FreeBSD" isn't any sort of organization that hires people to do
things like this.  If the FreeBSD community wants token ring, someone
will stop forward and write the appropriate drivers.  It hasn't
happened yet, so the FreeBSD community isn't very interested or there
isn't anyone in the FreeBSD community interested enough in writing the
code who feels they have the right skills to do the job.

If you feel FreeBSD should expand into Token Ring, go for it.  I would
do it if I felt I had the time, but working on TCP/IP code all day at
work, I don't really feel like writing Token Ring drivers in my spare
time.

-Dave

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?851zwr39v1.fsf>