Date: Wed, 09 Sep 1998 12:27:44 -0600 From: Warner Losh <imp@village.org> To: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> Cc: cvs-all@freebsd.org, cvs-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/conf files Message-ID: <199809091827.MAA04743@harmony.village.org> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 10 Sep 1998 04:15:40 %2B1000." <199809091815.EAA10016@godzilla.zeta.org.au> References: <199809091815.EAA10016@godzilla.zeta.org.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <199809091815.EAA10016@godzilla.zeta.org.au> Bruce Evans writes: : This is fairly bogus and doesn't actually work for `make -jN'. : First, subr_bus.c doesn't depend on *_if.h. subr_bus.o depends : on them. config(8) converts the dependency. Second, several : other .o files depend on *_if.h. This is handled for the usual : case by totally disordering the files list to put subr_bus.c : before the sources for the other object files. This kludge fails : completely for `make -jN'. The problem is handled for application : makefiles by making all .o files depend on all generated .h files : when .depend doesn't exist. See bsd.prog.mk and about 100 log : messages for application makefiles. Hmmm, the make -j 5 works for me after a make clean. I wonder why that would work if it were completely bogus :-) I agree that there are other files that depend on these files. I also agree that subr_bus.o is the file that actually depends on this file. Config generates the proper dependency on the .o file. There are at least two files that depend on bus_if.h and device_if.h. If this isn't the place to do this for the kernel, what is the right thing to do? Warner
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199809091827.MAA04743>