Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 18 Dec 2007 10:52:06 +0300
From:      "Yuriy Tsibizov" <Yuriy.Tsibizov@gfk.com>
To:        <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
Subject:   RE: story about lost %ebx (stack corruption in inet_aton ?)
Message-ID:  <78664C02FF341B4FAC63E561846E3BCC0EEA56@ex.hhp.local>
In-Reply-To: <78664C02FF341B4FAC63E561846E3BCC0EEA52@ex.hhp.local>
References:  <78664C02FF341B4FAC63E561846E3BCC0EEA52@ex.hhp.local>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> My first impression was that there is a bug in gcc compiler on 7-BETA
> and 8-CURRENT (i386 only, and only if optimization is enabled), but it
> seems to be incorrect. Most probably source is stack corruption in
> inet_aton()

mistyped, it is inet_network() that fails...

testcase:

#include <sys/cdefs.h>
#include <sys/types.h>
#include <netinet/in.h>
#include <arpa/inet.h>
#include <ctype.h>

int main(){
int val;
char s[]=3D"10.10.0.10.0/12"; // four dots here!
char *q;

        q =3D strchr(s,'/');
        if (q) {
                *q =3D '\0';
                if ((val =3D inet_network(s)) !=3D INADDR_NONE) {
                        printf("OK\n");
                        return (0);
                }
                printf("q=3D %08x\n", q);
                *q =3D '/';
        }
}


(should be built with -O1 or -O2 to expose that bug)

Yuriy.




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?78664C02FF341B4FAC63E561846E3BCC0EEA56>