Date: Tue, 9 Feb 1999 08:22:15 -0600 (CST) From: Richard Wackerbarth <rkw@nomad.dataplex.net> To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@zippy.cdrom.com> Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Which DHCP client Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.05.9902090809300.5007-100000@nomad.dataplex.net> In-Reply-To: <5653.918560574@zippy.cdrom.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Jordan, I object to the idea that the selection of which dhcp client is being made on the basis that David has commit privledges and I do not. Further, it is clear that David has not used a recent release of the isc client and is biasing his opinion with false assertions. It is my opinion that we should not use this criteria to decide which client will become a part of the base system. I have been "bmake"ing the isc client for almost a year. Requests to get assistance in comitting it went unanswered. I believe the isc client to be a better choice. If size is a real concern, perhaps we should treat this client as we do the shell in PicoBSD. I'm not convinced that the differences are that great. However, the flexability is :-) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.05.9902090809300.5007-100000>