Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 27 Apr 2001 07:44:36 +0200
From:      "Steve O'Hara-Smith" <steveo@eircom.net>
To:        Matt Dillon <dillon@earth.backplane.com>
Cc:        jwd@bsdwins.com, current@FreeBSD.ORG, asmodai@wxs.nl
Subject:   Re: cp -u patch
Message-ID:  <20010427074436.2fc7bd29.steveo@eircom.net>
In-Reply-To: <200104262126.f3QLQkA56841@earth.backplane.com>
References:  <20010426222132.B55566@daemon.ninth-circle.org> <20010426171522.A51935@bsdwins.com> <200104262126.f3QLQkA56841@earth.backplane.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 26 Apr 2001 14:26:46 -0700 (PDT)
Matt Dillon <dillon@earth.backplane.com> wrote:


MD>     There is a whole lot more to doing an efficient copy then simply checking
MD>     the mtime.  It's silly to try to integrate it into 'cp'.  Use cpdup
MD>     instead.  plug plug plug.

	OK plug away - why is cpdup better than rsync ?

-- 
Optimal hardware acceleration for Windows PC (Mac).
   9.81 m/s/s applied for (at least) 2s followed by impact with solid object.
Optimal software upgrade
   FreeBSD (OS-X).

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010427074436.2fc7bd29.steveo>