Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2010 12:28:31 -0800 From: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> To: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> Cc: Doug Barton <dougb@freebsd.org>, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org, svn-src-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: INCLUDE_CONFIG_FILE in GENERIC Message-ID: <4B4E2CEF.5030709@elischer.org> In-Reply-To: <201001131515.08602.jhb@freebsd.org> References: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1001110348100.92627@serrsnyy.serrofq.bet> <20100112.174326.337739863389869251.imp@bsdimp.com> <4B4E1586.7090102@FreeBSD.org> <201001131515.08602.jhb@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
John Baldwin wrote: > On Wednesday 13 January 2010 1:48:38 pm Doug Barton wrote: >> To address the other responses, Tom, sorry, your suggested text doesn't >> address my concern. John, I don't think that users would somehow >> magically know to look in NOTES for more information about an option >> that is already in GENERIC. > > You really think users do not already know to look in manpages or NOTES to > find out more details about kernel options? how about a one line comment in GENERIC suggesting that people look at NOTES for more info.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4B4E2CEF.5030709>