Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 27 Mar 2003 16:23:42 +0100
From:      Stijn Hoop <stijn@win.tue.nl>
To:        Robert Garrett <rg70@sbcglobal.net>
Cc:        freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: make release without a lot of the base system
Message-ID:  <20030327152342.GC29239@pcwin002.win.tue.nl>
In-Reply-To: <20030327151334.GB1597@sbcglobal.net>
References:  <20030327111440.GJ93053@pcwin002.win.tue.nl> <20030327115428.GF98283@madman.celabo.org> <20030327120633.GN93053@pcwin002.win.tue.nl> <20030327150605.GB29239@pcwin002.win.tue.nl> <20030327151334.GB1597@sbcglobal.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--CblX+4bnyfN0pR09
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, Mar 27, 2003 at 09:13:34AM -0600, Robert Garrett wrote:
> Not that my opinion matters but shouldn't this point to all the variables
> in /etc/defaults/make.conf? as they would all be applicable in this insta=
nce?

Well yes they are applicable of course, but I thought the distinction was t=
hat
defaults/make.conf documented all variables having to do with
buildworld/installworld, while release(7) documented variables that affected
solely the release build process. NOKERBEROS is only used in the release
Makefile.

--Stijn

--=20
Nostalgia ain't what it used to be.

--CblX+4bnyfN0pR09
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQE+gxd+Y3r/tLQmfWcRAq+oAKCTQXOMw53Ib1EYTzZirrHUk4EVGACgrQKF
rUACMDvAaMwp4k667oqgvnc=
=5CL2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--CblX+4bnyfN0pR09--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030327152342.GC29239>