Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2005 20:54:41 +0000 (GMT) From: Robert Watson <rwatson@freebsd.org> To: Richard Coleman <rcoleman@criticalmagic.com> Cc: Ivan Voras <ivoras@fer.hr> Subject: Re: MFC wishlist Message-ID: <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1050112205320.51702B-100000@fledge.watson.org> In-Reply-To: <41E553EB.10809@criticalmagic.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 12 Jan 2005, Richard Coleman wrote: > > No, because the project has no ability to "assign > > priority/resources". If someone who has is intrested and capable time > > to work on it, does so in time, then it may be done, if not, it > > won't. > > Should we take this to mean that none of the developers are interested > in ULE any more? That's the general feeling I get these days. Just > curious. Well, Jeff had a spurt of activity just before Christmas in which he corrected some issues relating to scheduling, and also committed a visual scheduling analysis tool that is both (a) quite neat, and (b) intended to help him measure and optimize scheduling. However, he's not been seen since then, so perhaps he went on vacation for a few weeks. From conversations with him, it sounded like he would be investing a substantial mount of time on the SMP VFS locking work, and also on SCHED_ULE. Robert N M Watson
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.NEB.3.96L.1050112205320.51702B-100000>