Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2014 12:55:26 -0500 From: Brad Fleming <bdflemin@gmail.com> To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Potential Doc Mistake Message-ID: <CF43A967-0328-4B52-8A20-477175F1A782@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <44wqex5czr.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> References: <DEE55AA1-986C-465C-9009-50ED3E91205C@gmail.com> <44wqex5czr.fsf@be-well.ilk.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The command as listed fails on my 9.2-RELEASE VM. But perhaps that=92s = different in other versions. In either case I=92m not a Free BSD master = and could certainly be wrong. On Apr 10, 2014, at 12:08 PM, Lowell Gilbert = <freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org> wrote: > Brad Fleming <bdflemin@gmail.com> writes: >=20 >> I think this document might have syntax error: >> = https://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/updating-upgrading-freebsdupdate.html= >>=20 >> Under "23.2.3.2. Performing the Upgrade=94 the first command listed = is: >> "freebsd-update -r 9.1-RELEASE upgrade=94 >> but I believe the proper command should be: >> "freebsd-update upgrade -r 9.1-RELEASE=94 >> (the =93upgrade=94 is in the wrong place) >>=20 >> I could certainly be wrong but the second command is what=92s = referenced >> in other documents and was required for me to move from 9.2 to 10.0. >=20 > The manual page actually lists options before the subcommand. A quick > look at the source makes me think that either order is fine.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CF43A967-0328-4B52-8A20-477175F1A782>