Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2013 18:58:53 -0500 From: Eitan Adler <lists@eitanadler.com> To: Jakub Lach <jakub_lach@mailplus.pl> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 7+ days of dogfood Message-ID: <CAF6rxgk%2BDwRvbhQXjDzbpaVrnrF_v6Qxo3X2vKtJbJhxYPv=pQ@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <1360711426271-5786468.post@n5.nabble.com> References: <20130210000723.GA73630@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <E1U4QTd-0003BM-7s@clue.co.za> <511AC875.1000704@daemonic.se> <CAF6rxgk0UK4Hvj4hNOrMh1ADemsWwQjtu_tiuz9sUo0st5bbQg@mail.gmail.com> <1360711426271-5786468.post@n5.nabble.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 12 February 2013 18:23, Jakub Lach <jakub_lach@mailplus.pl> wrote: > This is good moment to bring that around, > > https://wiki.freebsd.org/PortsAndClang > > "Help we don't want: > Submitting ports PR without fixes. We're not yet at the point > where it can help." > > Is not exactly encouraging. At the time this was written we had exp-runs which told us which ports were broken with clang. What we needed help with was fixing those ports, or marking them known-broken. I imagine this has changed slightly since then. -- Eitan Adler
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAF6rxgk%2BDwRvbhQXjDzbpaVrnrF_v6Qxo3X2vKtJbJhxYPv=pQ>