Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 11:59:59 -0700 From: Craig Rodrigues <rodrigc@FreeBSD.org> To: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> Cc: "freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org" <freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org>, freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Subject: Re: VIMAGE + PF crash in mbuf destructor Message-ID: <CAG=rPVd3F2sfwizJuEngxexo0Rby2qwzqpAB4_K-fZXXb8-Rmw@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CAJ-VmomAC573hrQivfT9Gn_tJn5SkMhM_MK8hUCbtr-7D-NGDw@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAG=rPVfxFiOVOeSyDP=wBubNQCHK5dqcgBBaJjeS6XXtSZSZqg@mail.gmail.com> <51ED5308.3020008@gmx.com> <CAJ-VmomAC573hrQivfT9Gn_tJn5SkMhM_MK8hUCbtr-7D-NGDw@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 10:11 AM, Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> wrote: > > I don't think the default vnet context is the correct behaviour there. > We'd need to figure out what the vnet context of the mbuf is and set > that. > > What do you think about Marko's suggestion to de-virtualize V_pf_mtag_z? What would be the down side of that? I don't understand enough of the PF code to understand which variables need to be virtual and which don't. -- Craig
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAG=rPVd3F2sfwizJuEngxexo0Rby2qwzqpAB4_K-fZXXb8-Rmw>