Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2013 23:54:02 +0100 From: Michael Gmelin <freebsd@grem.de> To: Mark Martinec <Mark.Martinec+freebsd@ijs.si> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Update devel/zmq (once more, this time Cc ports@) Message-ID: <20131106235402.384c27e8@bsd64.grem.de> In-Reply-To: <201311062345.29321.Mark.Martinec%2Bfreebsd@ijs.si> References: <20131106230522.5a261aec@bsd64.grem.de> <CAHtVNLNcVb-dNPYTaxKMVSkv0a_Nz9RyotMqorXo2JR%2BG7KxEw@mail.gmail.com> <201311062345.29321.Mark.Martinec%2Bfreebsd@ijs.si>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 6 Nov 2013 23:45:29 +0100 Mark Martinec <Mark.Martinec+freebsd@ijs.si> wrote: > Michael Gmelin wrote: > > any chance you'll update zmq to the latest version in the near > > future, or at to least 3.2.4? sysutils/py-salt depends on it and > > has keep-alive issues with the old/outdated version. > > Not just keep-alive, the Salt needs libzmq version 3 for IPv6 support. > > The Salt authors state that libzmq version 2 is often unreliable, > the version 3 now solves most of their reliability/stability issues. > And the salt authors are right about this, as I experienced in the last couple of days. Apparently there's a reason why salt logs a big warning about using zmq 2 on every start :) -- Michael Gmelin
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20131106235402.384c27e8>