Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2010 12:50:29 +0000 From: "b. f." <bf1783@googlemail.com> To: mav@FreeBSD.org Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: One-shot-oriented event timers management Message-ID: <AANLkTin3ZfGxW5aKBzdpokEEyvEjO6ifjUCKRBhS6vBN@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In: http://people.freebsd.org/~mav/timers_oneshot7.patch you need to offset the declaration of 'cpu' in getnextevent() on line 256 of src/sys/kern/kern_clocksource.c by #ifdef SMP, because it is not used otherwise, and will break UP kernel builds with our default warnings and -Werror. Incidentally, do you intend to commit the tm6292_idle.patch along with the new timer code, after testing is satisfactory? Or is this not appropriate for general use? If it isn't suitable for all users, perhaps some of the periods of the events in that patch can be abstracted and made tunable, so that we can make it possible to conserve power, and also keep others happy? Regards, b.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AANLkTin3ZfGxW5aKBzdpokEEyvEjO6ifjUCKRBhS6vBN>