Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2014 22:52:12 +0100 From: Steve Burton <steve@sliderule.demon.co.uk> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Handbook, upgrading ports incorrect with 10.0-RELEASE? Message-ID: <5347128C.2050207@sliderule.demon.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <4634538.SMM6loVsS1@amd.asgard.uk> References: <534520DE.5060005@relst.nl> <534565E9.8080109@relst.nl> <0558889B-6B6C-40E2-95DD-70DDA98B51F4@gmail.com> <4634538.SMM6loVsS1@amd.asgard.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 10/04/2014 22:49, dgmm wrote: > On Wednesday 09 April 2014 10:52:57 Matthew Pherigo wrote: >> So you really want just to see the versions, and then you upgrade them by >> hand. In that case, the correct option would indeed be "pkg version". > > pkg version is so sloooooow > > I use portversion from portupgrade package. It's much, much faster. > > portversion -l \< > > or > > portversion -L = > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > Changing the Handbook would violate the Principle of Most Astonishment... Steve.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5347128C.2050207>