Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2013 14:56:37 -0700 From: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> To: Ed Schouten <ed@80386.nl> Cc: Matthew Fleming <mdf@freebsd.org>, FreeBSD Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: -ffunction-sections, -fdata-sections and -Wl,--gc-sections Message-ID: <CAJ-VmonnuskWb%2Bk7JtpgAfB6PV3FD6YCgreioJcfhBpCJm6naA@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CAJOYFBBUT5v1E6L0JkdrAXFmJmR0W2tmyNrC71k8mahLiF5vWg@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAJOYFBBGY0GosPwG1B=1MKyapChEtX-O97r2zhXpGS8o7WO3gA@mail.gmail.com> <CAMBSHm_Qk13P=j1VOzuibYaeHFVF%2BCuXbTYL=q8ToDP6wL5X5w@mail.gmail.com> <CAJOYFBBUT5v1E6L0JkdrAXFmJmR0W2tmyNrC71k8mahLiF5vWg@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
... I'd rather see if we can actually separate out things some more so these builds can shrink. Eg, if there's malloc related functions that aren't used, maybe we should break malloc down into a directory full of functions. I'm not surprised libc++ is doing .. that. It's likely better on the compile time to have things bundled up in one big source file. Sigh. -adrian
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAJ-VmonnuskWb%2Bk7JtpgAfB6PV3FD6YCgreioJcfhBpCJm6naA>