Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 11:46:07 -0700 From: Nate Lawson <nate@root.org> To: Marcin Jessa <lists@yazzy.org> Cc: acpi@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: acpi battery rework patch Message-ID: <42E684EF.3030601@root.org> In-Reply-To: <20050726093317.522452a6.lists@yazzy.org> References: <42E1481F.5040306@root.org> <d9175cad050723030041dd7387@mail.gmail.com> <20050723133819.36efb537.lists@yazzy.org> <42E29CAA.1020007@root.org> <d9175cad0507232047160cc758@mail.gmail.com> <20050724215818.55f951ae.lists@yazzy.org> <42E42F10.3030309@root.org> <20050725091221.106a0368.lists@yazzy.org> <42E5134F.706@root.org> <20050726011943.0abe83a0.lists@yazzy.org> <42E5C96C.9060105@root.org> <20050726093317.522452a6.lists@yazzy.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Marcin Jessa wrote: > On Mon, 25 Jul 2005 22:26:04 -0700 > Nate Lawson <nate@root.org> wrote: >>There is no bug here, this info is correct and matches the kernel >>behavior before my commit. So what is the buggy behavior? > > > In the first email i could not see the remining time when running on battery but then after a short while I sent one more email as reply to my own saying it showed up and this was propably becouse ACPI did not manage to get the battery state yet. > I dont know if there was any bug. I thought you had some issues so I tried to help. > It seems like we both wasted our time on a perfectly good code becouse you missed my second email :) Ok, thanks for clearing this up. No more info is necessary. -- Nate
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?42E684EF.3030601>