Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 5 Feb 2004 09:36:31 -0900
From:      "Mark Weisman" <mark@mystic1.net>
To:        <lee@slaughters.com>, "Simon Barner" <barner@in.tum.de>
Cc:        freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   RE: Good comments
Message-ID:  <88EB08D16800D34EA145D7DD2AA44998E60F@minnie.outland>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Lee,
  I'm not involved in FreeBSD in any way, however, currently all seven
of my webservers and support group run on a flavor of FreeBSD dating all
the way back to the 4.4-Stables that run DNS. The boxes run
exceptionally well with uptimes in the teens of months. I've recently
updated my primary webserver to 5.1 release, and other than a few of my
own stupidity moments, it too rocks. I have installed this, and will
continue to install this, and only this, operating system as the
Internet system of choice.

  My two cents...

Res Ipsa Loquitor,
Mark-Nathaniel Weisman
Site Master
Mystic1.net


-----Original Message-----
From: lee slaughter [mailto:lee@slaughters.com]=20
Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2004 9:31 AM
To: Simon Barner
Cc: Bluegravity82@aol.com; freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: Good comments


Simon Barner wrote:

>Hi,
>
> =20
>
>>                 I just bought BSDfree version 5.1 because I had very=20
>>good
>>comments about your operating system. Our company is planning to use
as a NAT=20
>>server . I want to know where can I take some courses to have at least
the=20
>>basics that it looks to be an awesome operating system.
>>   =20
>>
>
>For a production system, the 5.x branch of FreeBSD (sic!) is not quite=20
>ready yet, so you should better go with FreeBSD 4.9 (FreeBSD 4.x is the

>so-called stable branch at the present).
>
>If you insist in deploying FreeBSD 5.x, please note that FreeBSD 5.2 is

>already out.
> =20
>

I too bought shrink-wrapped 5.1 CD set from bookstore and now have it=20
running pretty well.
I really don't feel like re-installing it already but the implication is

that if you (unwittingly) installed a -CURRENT, you need to keep it up,=20
i.e. go  today to 5.2, etc.....

I don't wanna do that. I'm newbie and my box is  production-prone and I=20
don't want bleeding edge and too ignorant to be in the -CURRENT branch.

So....  are we recommended to go to 4.9-STABLE?  (implying no updates=20
until next -STABLE comes out? =20

What are the dire consequences of staying with 5.1 until 5-STABLE comes=20
out... and not  always upgrading?

tks..... this is a great os and a great support group, btw.

lee slaughter


_______________________________________________
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
"freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?88EB08D16800D34EA145D7DD2AA44998E60F>