Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 07:49:53 -0400 From: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> To: Andrew Boyer <aboyer@averesystems.com> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, philip-freebsd1@soeberg.net Subject: Re: device_detach() on a device used by ixgbe driver (FreeBSD 7-STABLE through to 9-CURRENT) Message-ID: <201105240749.53149.jhb@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <EE06CEF1-B4A1-46A4-9438-A883EFCFB7B3@averesystems.com> References: <4DDA6B95.3090704@soeberg.net> <201105231032.20084.jhb@freebsd.org> <EE06CEF1-B4A1-46A4-9438-A883EFCFB7B3@averesystems.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Monday, May 23, 2011 3:08:05 pm Andrew Boyer wrote: > > On May 23, 2011, at 10:32 AM, John Baldwin wrote: > > > On Monday, May 23, 2011 10:13:41 am Philip Soeberg wrote: > >> I would also expect the ixgbe.c driver to do a quick resource_disabled() > >> in it's attach() function, so that we can disable specific adapters > >> through kenv hint.ix.0.disabled=1.. > > > > That is not universally supported (i.e. it's not a part of new-bus > > specifically). For buses that support hinted devices, they do all generally > > support being able to disable a hinted device, but disabling bus- enumerated > > devices is not generally supported. > > > > FYI, I submitted a patch to Jack to add this in all of the e1000/ixgbe drivers. Setting a disabled="1" hint causes the attach to fail with ENXIO. I don't know if it's 'correct' or not but it serves a purpose in our testing and I thought it would be useful for others. One patch I have had for a while is a way to disable specific PCI devices, but that's not quite the same thing as it disables all drivers for a given device. (It adds support for a 'hw.pci<domain>.<bus>.<slot>.<function>.disabled=1' tunable). -- John Baldwin
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201105240749.53149.jhb>