Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 22:57:11 +0200 From: Manolis Kiagias <sonicy@otenet.gr> To: Robert Huff <roberthuff@rcn.com> Cc: Henry Olyer <henry.olyer@gmail.com>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: libjpeg.so.9 missing from my installation of FBSD 7.2 Message-ID: <4AF9D3A7.1060806@otenet.gr> In-Reply-To: <19193.49116.848405.783871@jerusalem.litteratus.org> References: <1d7089c40911100809l3f71c819lf7febcf139407c8f@mail.gmail.com> <4AF9A10E.5090603@otenet.gr> <19193.49116.848405.783871@jerusalem.litteratus.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Robert Huff wrote: > Manolis Kiagias writes: > > >> Where you performing an upgrade of an existing system? >> AFAIK libjpeg.so.* libraries get installed by the graphics/jpeg port. >> This was (fairly) recently upgraded, and if you did not follow the >> /usr/ports/UPDATING instructions carefully, you probably ended up with >> some dependent apps still linked to the old version of the library. >> >> In short, try the following (assuming you use portupgrade): >> >> portupgrade -fr graphics/jpeg >> > > graphics/jpeg is a dependency for a _lot_ of ports. (100+ on > my system.) Were I in the OP's shoes, I'd run pkg_info -R to find > out which ones and feed the (edited) results through pkg_sort. > Otherwise I might find myself rebuilding something like OpenOffice > at an inopportune moment .... > > > Robert "thirty six hours and counting, tra-la" Huff > > I am afraid openoffice is indeed one of the packages linked to jpg.. In this case - and assuming this was caused by an improper upgrade of jpeg - maybe the OP could simply downgrade just the jpeg port to the previous version. The current version provides libjpeg.so.10
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4AF9D3A7.1060806>