Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2007 10:43:12 +1100 From: Andrew Reilly <andrew-freebsd@areilly.bpc-users.org> To: Doug Ambrisko <ambrisko@ambrisko.com> Cc: Nikolas, Kip Macy <kip.macy@gmail.com>, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Britton <nikolas.britton@gmail.com>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Don't buy AMD products (was Re: Xorg and ATI card query.) Message-ID: <20070314104312.57354947@duncan.reilly.home> In-Reply-To: <200703132217.l2DMH0OD051784@ambrisko.com> References: <b1fa29170703131446v6ea65dabr952b8b65e3cce605@mail.gmail.com> <200703132217.l2DMH0OD051784@ambrisko.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 13 Mar 2007 14:17:00 -0800 (PST) Doug Ambrisko <ambrisko@ambrisko.com> wrote: > One thing that is a plus with nv is that X has some support for it, > whereas, the newer ati cards have no support :-( I was a fan of ati > since it was easier to get support. Now I'm starting to lean towards > Nvidia :-( Does anyone know if there are *any* contemporary graphics cards that have 3D acceleration supported by some flavour of open-source x.org? Doesn't have to be a super-fast 'leet gamer system to be better than a non-accelerated frame buffer. Matrox used to have a reputation for goodness (I used to have a G400 or the like), but it's been a long time... (I'm currently using a lowish-end NVidia card under the x.org nv driver, but it has issues (of which no 3D accel is but one...) Cheers, -- Andrew
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070314104312.57354947>