Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2001 16:42:48 -0800 (PST) From: David Wolfskill <david@catwhisker.org> To: brooks@one-eyed-alien.net, david@catwhisker.org Cc: audit@FreeBSD.ORG, current@FreeBSD.ORG, phk@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Call for review... PR 25577 Message-ID: <200103310042.f2V0gmo26654@bunrab.catwhisker.org> In-Reply-To: <20010330163530.A23549@Odin.AC.HMC.Edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2001 16:35:30 -0800 >From: Brooks Davis <brooks@one-eyed-alien.net> >> Or am I just being rather denser than usual? >No, you're entirely correct. However, this isn't my fault. ;-).... OK; fair enough (and thanks for the reality check). :-} So far, it (the patchset) seems to not break anything (which is a moderately nice characteristic), and it looks to have some very useful capabilities. And yes, I think you (Broooks) are correct in judging that the -m (for displaying the mediaopts, and then one per line) is probably better for a separate patch. I'll try to spend some more time with it over the weekend, but I certainly see no objection to committing it as it stands presently. I *may* try it out on -STABLE (not entirely altruism on my part; it would make my life simpler). Cheers, david -- David H. Wolfskill david@catwhisker.org As a computing professional, I believe it would be unethical for me to advise, recommend, or support the use (save possibly for personal amusement) of any product that is or depends on any Microsoft product. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200103310042.f2V0gmo26654>