Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2013 07:06:50 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Michael_Gr=FCnewald?= <michael.grunewald@laposte.net> To: marino@freebsd.org Cc: Rui Paulo <rpaulo@felyko.com>, FreeBSD ports <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: OCaml 4? Message-ID: <527B2DFA.1060406@laposte.net> In-Reply-To: <527AA687.9080405@marino.st> References: <830ACA3E-9233-453F-A891-2EA0F0B9F2DB@felyko.com> <527A9A9B.2040202@laposte.net> <527A9BB8.5010401@marino.st> <527AA045.7000302@laposte.net> <527AA687.9080405@marino.st>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
John Marino wrote: > On 11/6/2013 21:02, Michael Grünewald wrote: >> It seems dports has ocaml 4.00.1 while I prepared a 4.01.0, if you test >> it, your feddback would be welcome! > > Surely dports could be updated to ocaml 4.01.0 as easily as changing the > PORTVERSION and regenerating the distinfo file? Besides this, there is a minor update of the configure script, you can get it from http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/173364 or https://bitbucket.org/michipili/ports-bsd (branch ocaml) > As such, the vast majority of dports identical or nearly so to their > ports counterparts. At most they contain extra patches or a couple of > extra switches often contained in Makefile.DragonFly. That is nice to know, thank you! -- Michael
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?527B2DFA.1060406>