Date: Wed, 02 Dec 1998 15:40:41 -0800 From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@zippy.cdrom.com> To: Ollivier Robert <roberto@keltia.freenix.fr> Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Can we just come to a decision on IPv6 and IPSec? Message-ID: <9779.912642041@zippy.cdrom.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 02 Dec 1998 23:58:33 %2B0100." <19981202235833.A1061@keltia.freenix.fr>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Ahem, this can be said for INRIA as well as Francis is a FreeBSD user, has > worked for NetBSD too (even before FreeBSD) and his work has been included > in NetBSD and I think OpenBSD. This is also the base for AIX stuff (like it > or not, IBM took the INRIA code not another one). > > We have at least two people (including one committer) willing to port & > maintain to 3.0 & CURRENT. What is the status of it now, however? Does it work with -current and exist in a committable state? Does IPv6 and IPSec work? What about OpenBSD's stated intention to merge the INRIA work with their own and standardise on some sort of "hybrid" project? Is INRIA taking this work back? I'm still waiting for some sort of indication that KAME does all of these things, for example. Everyone says it's good, but nobody will say whether or not it works well enough to replace the IPSec port which is sitting in our PR database and, as I said, is being actually used in real-life situations. If neither KAME nor INRIA is ready to perform this role yet, that's something we also need to be aware of. - Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?9779.912642041>