Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 13:18:41 -0800 (PST) From: Nate Lawson <nate@root.org> To: Chuck Tuffli <chuck_tuffli@agilent.com> Cc: freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: SIM as loadable module? Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0211201317200.64851-100000@root.org> In-Reply-To: <20021120195956.GB35733@cre85086tuf.rose.agilent.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 20 Nov 2002, Chuck Tuffli wrote: > On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 11:06:04AM -0800, Nate Lawson wrote: > > fcPortGetInfo?). I guess your approach should be necessary in the FC case > > since your position in the chain can change when you get a LIP. > > Wouldn't the driver want to insulate the CAM from this kind of event? > I was thinking that the CAM's view of TID should be independent from > FC's view of NPort_ID. The intent would be that the WWN of TID x > should be the same before and after a LIP, but the mapping of TID to > NPort_ID may change. You might want to check with Matt. IIRC, isp allows target order to change when a LIP occurs. -Nate To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-scsi" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0211201317200.64851-100000>