Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 2 Feb 2000 18:34:55 +0000 (GMT)
From:      Mark Powell <M.S.Powell@salford.ac.uk>
To:        freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Subject:   Can 3.4-S cope with packets not addressed to it?
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.4.05.10002021826460.22673-100000@plato.salford.ac.uk>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
We want to force the use of our web caches. Our boundary router is a 3Com
NetBuilder II, which we can get to forward port 80 traffic to another IP
address. However, it does not rewrite the destination IP address in the IP
header. Thus the machine has to be directly connected to the router to
actually get the packets.
  What I'm wondering, is can FreeBSD cope with this? Will it be able to
process these packets, with an IP address that is not it's own, at all or
is this a non-starter? I suppose if it can then a more elegant solution to
our caching needs can be found. We have two caches and would ideally like
to spread this forwarded traffic across them. Could a 3rd FreeBSD box be
plugged directly into the router and selectively forward packets to both
servers? This would enable load balancing of this enforced traffic.
  Thanks for any help, as it's the first time I've even attempted anything
like this. I'm assuming that ipfw or ipfilter will be what I want, but I
have little experience of them.
Cheers.

Mark Powell - UNIX System Administrator - Clifford Whitworth Building
A.I.S., University of Salford, Salford, Manchester, UK.
Tel: +44 161 295 5936  Fax: +44 161 295 5888  www.pgp.com for PGP key
M.S.Powell@ais.salfrd.ac.uk (spell salford correctly to reply to me)



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.05.10002021826460.22673-100000>