Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2010 20:32:20 +0200 From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= <des@des.no> To: lev@FreeBSD.org Cc: Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@FreeBSD.org>, Alexander Motin <mav@FreeBSD.org>, FreeBSD-Current <freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org>, Richard Tector <richardtector@thekeelecentre.com>, freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Switchover to CAM ATA? Message-ID: <86633bv363.fsf@ds4.des.no> In-Reply-To: <1239259726.20100428222039@serebryakov.spb.ru> (Lev Serebryakov's message of "Wed, 28 Apr 2010 22:20:39 %2B0400") References: <4BD06BD9.6030401@FreeBSD.org> <4BD099E6.6000402@FreeBSD.org> <4BD0A689.8000508@thekeelecentre.com> <4BD0ACD2.3040805@FreeBSD.org> <86och53tpl.fsf@ds4.des.no> <1239259726.20100428222039@serebryakov.spb.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Lev Serebryakov <lev@FreeBSD.org> writes: > "Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav" <des@des.no> writes: > > Most pseudo-raid kit has nifty features like checksum offloading, > > composite writes etc. > Why are they called ``PSEUDO-raids'' then? Several reasons - they don't present the array to the OS as a single device, they don't handle failover, etc. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86633bv363.fsf>