Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2013 16:31:04 -0700 From: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> To: Ian Lepore <ian@freebsd.org> Cc: Ed Schouten <ed@80386.nl>, FreeBSD Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>, Matthew Fleming <mdf@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: -ffunction-sections, -fdata-sections and -Wl,--gc-sections Message-ID: <CAJ-VmokpYwqR-V-iocBs_hYJwBfdcafA81r3uuOVwUwgVc2r0A@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <1379460140.1197.59.camel@revolution.hippie.lan> References: <CAJOYFBBGY0GosPwG1B=1MKyapChEtX-O97r2zhXpGS8o7WO3gA@mail.gmail.com> <CAMBSHm_Qk13P=j1VOzuibYaeHFVF%2BCuXbTYL=q8ToDP6wL5X5w@mail.gmail.com> <CAJOYFBBUT5v1E6L0JkdrAXFmJmR0W2tmyNrC71k8mahLiF5vWg@mail.gmail.com> <CAJ-VmonnuskWb%2Bk7JtpgAfB6PV3FD6YCgreioJcfhBpCJm6naA@mail.gmail.com> <1379460140.1197.59.camel@revolution.hippie.lan>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 17 September 2013 16:22, Ian Lepore <ian@freebsd.org> wrote: > On Tue, 2013-09-17 at 14:56 -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote: > > ... I'd rather see if we can actually separate out things some more so > > these builds can shrink. > > > > Eg, if there's malloc related functions that aren't used, maybe we should > > break malloc down into a directory full of functions. > > > > Why is that better than using this automated solution? > Not everyone is going to run clang on their target development platform? :-) Personally I'd rather structure my work to behave better instead of doing something that relies on a specific tool/suite to be able to optimise. -adrian
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAJ-VmokpYwqR-V-iocBs_hYJwBfdcafA81r3uuOVwUwgVc2r0A>