Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2014 18:00:38 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 191439] New: net/samba41: Add ADDC option, change default options Message-ID: <bug-191439-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D191439 Bug ID: 191439 Summary: net/samba41: Add ADDC option, change default options Product: Ports Tree Version: Latest Hardware: Any OS: Any Status: Needs Triage Severity: Affects Many People Priority: --- Component: Individual Port(s) Assignee: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Reporter: bugzilla.freebsd@omnilan.de I prepared a patchset which can reduce dependencies a bit by making it poss= ible to disable (in my world disabled by default =E2=80=93 so to enable) sambas = =C2=BBbuilt-in=C2=AB ActiveDirectory-DomainController (ADDC). It's a simple matter of the config= ure argument "--without-ad-dc". Now libsasl2, libgcrypt and libgnutls are no mandatory LIB_DEPENDS. I also made NSUPDATE really optional, not one-out-of-3-choice (OPTION_RADIO= vs. OPTION_SINGLE). Additionally I changed OPTIONS_DEFAULT from ${OPTIONS_DEFINE} (all) to that= I really used in the past 10 years of samba deployment. This is highly person= al experience, but I'd like to see the ADDC option disabled by default =E2=80= =93 in many cases that prevents fellows from digging into samba41, but samba36 has some serious unfixed bugs, which prevent stable usage even for most basic/essent= ial CIFS usage! (and I was told by a samba developer that only security fixes w= ill make it into any samba36 update, not even most serious bugfixes, known and fixed in samba4[1] long ago and confirmed to be serious=E2=80=A6) And last, I changed ADS_DESC to make clear, member support for ActiveDirect= ory is meant (not DomainController, which one can think since that's the main feature when talking about samba4[1])=20 Thanks, -Harry --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-191439-13>