Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 30 May 2013 19:18:29 +0000 (UTC)
From:      jb <jb.1234abcd@gmail.com>
To:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: "swap" partition leads to instability?
Message-ID:  <loom.20130530T210943-16@post.gmane.org>
References:  <1369558712.96152.YahooMailNeo@web165006.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> <loom.20130526T143506-872@post.gmane.org> <20130529133516.295084a6@gumby.homeunix.com> <loom.20130529T213928-77@post.gmane.org> <20130530160555.3104ced6@gumby.homeunix.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
RW <rwmaillists <at> googlemail.com> writes:

> ... 
> > Yes, there is some confusion about the diff, if any, between paging
> > and swapping.
> > 
> > Paging - copying or moving pages between physical memory (RAM) and
> > secondary storage (e.g. hard disk), in both directions.
> > Swapping - nowdays is synonymous with "paging".
> >   But its history is as follows (per Wikipedia):
> 
> This is a bit Linux-centric.
> ...
> You page-out pages and swap-out processes. 
> 
> When FreeBSD is very short of memory it swaps-out entire processes to
> concentrate the memory in the running processes. Linux goes directly
> from paging to killing processes.

That was helpful - knowing the details of VMM implementation in various OSs
helps understand the generalizations, with exceptions ...
jb





Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?loom.20130530T210943-16>