Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2014 15:28:55 +0900 From: Tomoaki AOKI <junchoon@dec.sakura.ne.jp> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: What's up with the swapping since 10/stable Message-ID: <20140405152855.1cfcf37c87bdff3306d0cd6c@dec.sakura.ne.jp> In-Reply-To: <CA%2BD9Qhvr%2Bny80J1zSxPNC_bH1gtvJAOxkfmLXxuiFZsRVyXQ3Q@mail.gmail.com> References: <CA%2BD9QhvDsTwosUxUeL2U05dMt%2BKe6kY5BYCNjJo8e8TsfZTsXg@mail.gmail.com> <A4BE503B-ADA9-4F61-893E-79A5F30728A2@bridgenet.se> <533DB9B1.3070500@denninger.net> <CA%2BD9Qhvr%2Bny80J1zSxPNC_bH1gtvJAOxkfmLXxuiFZsRVyXQ3Q@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Yes, Karl's patch fixed my swap regression, too. ZFS-root notebook with 8GB RAM, stable/10 amd64. No swap usage is observed after applying his patch, feeling (but not measured) no performance penalty. But unfortunately, the patch haven't been merged even to head. So, anyone chasing vanilla head or stable/10 has no fix yet. On Fri, 4 Apr 2014 09:24:52 +0200 Matthias Gamsjager <mgamsjager@gmail.com> wrote: > This was an old post and after few week Karl came up with an arc patch > which fixed this issue. -- Tomoaki AOKI junchoon@dec.sakura.ne.jp
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20140405152855.1cfcf37c87bdff3306d0cd6c>