Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2013 20:42:06 +0200 From: Terje Elde <terje@elde.net> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Possibly OT: NFS vs SMB performance Message-ID: <669058E9-E663-424E-94A6-29D81757C580@elde.net> In-Reply-To: <51D6F1E4.4090001@netfence.it> References: <51D6F1E4.4090001@netfence.it>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 5. juli 2013, at 18:18, Andrea Venturoli <ml@netfence.it> wrote: > Is this normal in your experience? Did you do them in that order, or did you do the smb (slow) one first? If the slow was first, I'm thinking caching on the server could be a major f= actor.=20 Terje
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?669058E9-E663-424E-94A6-29D81757C580>