Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2014 12:09:14 -0500 From: Dan Nelson <dnelson@allantgroup.com> To: Erich Dollansky <erichsfreebsdlist@alogt.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: size of source tree Message-ID: <20140412170914.GA18485@dan.emsphone.com> In-Reply-To: <20140412115423.11092d84@X220.alogt.com> References: <20140412115423.11092d84@X220.alogt.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In the last episode (Apr 12), Erich Dollansky said: > I just compared the size of the source tree dated 26.03.14 with the source > tree from today. > > The source tree dated 26.03.14 has a size of some 899GM while today's > source tree has some 1.8GB. > > Why is it suddenly so huge? You have both trees; you tell us :) Compare the output of "du -d 1" on each tree, and see where the difference in space is. The x11-fm/xdiskusage port gives a you a nice visualization of space usage, too. For reference, /usr/src on my servers is around 750 MB with ZFS compression (du -s), and 1.8 GB uncompressed (du -sA). -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20140412170914.GA18485>