Date: Wed, 30 Jul 1997 08:55:33 -0700 (PDT) From: Tom Samplonius <tom@sdf.com> To: Charles Henrich <henrich@crh.cl.msu.edu> Cc: craig@gnofn.org, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Pentium II? Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.95q.970730085513.1338B-100000@misery.sdf.com> In-Reply-To: <199707301500.LAA01362@crh.cl.msu.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 30 Jul 1997, Charles Henrich wrote: > In lists.freebsd.hackers you write: > > >The real issue is that the PII is untried, whereas FreeBSD systems > >on PPro hardware, like ftp.cdrom.com (which serves 2000 simultaneous > >ftp users) have been ticking along reliably for quite some time > >now. > > I've been running a P-II/266 for months, overclocked at 300 even. It works > flawlessly. It blows the hell out of my PPro/233. Hands Down, left right, > forwards, backwards, and inside out. And I dont give a rip if its Slot 1, > Slot 3, socket 8, or a bunch of wires glued to a CPU. I buy motherboards and > processors together, and I dont give a rip what the connection is. I require > performance for my apps, and there's nothing on the planet that will > (currently) touch a P-II/300. Yep, that's what I've been trying to say. > -Crh > -- > > Charles Henrich Michigan State University henrich@msu.edu > > http://pilot.msu.edu/~henrich > > Tom
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.95q.970730085513.1338B-100000>