Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2000 17:30:14 +0200 From: Alexander Langer <alex@big.endian.de> To: Dominic Mitchell <Dom.Mitchell@palmerharvey.co.uk> Cc: dom@palmerharvey.co.uk, FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.ORG, ache@FreeBSD.ORG, ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ports/18075: New version of unzip - 5.41 Message-ID: <20000418173014.C10536@cichlids.cichlids.com> In-Reply-To: <20000418161929.A976@voodoo.pandhm.co.uk>; from Dom.Mitchell@palmerharvey.co.uk on Tue, Apr 18, 2000 at 04:19:29PM %2B0100 References: <20000418122953.C75561B4@voodoo.pandhm.co.uk> <20000418144906.A7147@cichlids.cichlids.com> <20000418161929.A976@voodoo.pandhm.co.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Thus spake Dominic Mitchell (Dom.Mitchell@palmerharvey.co.uk): > I don't know. Now that encryption is part of the base port, it might be > a better idea to can the unzip.with_encryption port instead. This > probably needs to be fleshed out on the ports mailing list (cc'd). Is the encryption export-restricted in any way? If not, I see no reason why to keep the unzip.with-encryption port any longer. But I see RESTRICTED= "This program can't be imported/re-exported from USA" in the encrypted port. (what I no wonder is - why do I have this port installed?) Alex -- I need a new ~/.sig. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000418173014.C10536>