Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 7 Mar 1998 22:23:10 -0700
From:      Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com>
To:        John Birrell <jb@cimlogic.com.au>
Cc:        mike@smith.net.au (Mike Smith), cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-lib@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: src/lib/libc_r/uthread pthread_private.h uthread_yield.c
Message-ID:  <199803080523.WAA06336@mt.sri.com>
In-Reply-To: <199803080318.OAA10520@cimlogic.com.au>
References:  <199803080301.TAA08108@dingo.cdrom.com> <199803080318.OAA10520@cimlogic.com.au>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> that it will all just come out in the wash. Kernel threads aren't
> light weight, though.

If kernel threads aren't light-weight, then what differentiates them
from processes?



Nate



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199803080523.WAA06336>