Date: 25 Oct 1996 13:20:09 +0100 From: Paul Richards <p.richards@elsevier.co.uk> To: "Daniel M. Eischen" <deischen@iworks.InterWorks.org> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Experiences with CDE for FreeBSD Message-ID: <57pw27utfq.fsf@tees.elsevier.co.uk> In-Reply-To: "Daniel M. Eischen"'s message of Thu, 24 Oct 1996 18:45:01 -0500 References: <9610242345.AA10608@iworks.InterWorks.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
"Daniel M. Eischen" <deischen@iworks.InterWorks.org> writes: > Other than the above problems, everything else seems to be working > just fine. It looks very professional and just like CDE on > Solaris 2.5 - even the pretty login window. Is it as slow :-) Hmm, actually, really, how's performance, I quite liked CDE but the Sparc 5 at work was really sluggish but it might just have been that Solaris couldn't cope with CDE rather than CDE itself. CDE seemed to have a large memory footprint and I've noticed that Solaris isn't very happy unless it's got lots of headroom memory wise. -- Paul Richards. Originative Solutions Ltd. (Netcraft Ltd. contractor) Elsevier Science TIS online journal project. Email: p.richards@elsevier.co.uk Phone: 0370 462071 (Mobile), +44 (0)1865 843155
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?57pw27utfq.fsf>