Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 7 Sep 2008 13:22:44 +0800
From:      chinsan <chinsan.tw@gmail.com>
To:        "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com>
Cc:        arch@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: pax in /rescue
Message-ID:  <1f27304c0809062222m724603dat2fb1af63dba5faa6@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20080906.224018.-1303464793.imp@bsdimp.com>
References:  <20080906.224018.-1303464793.imp@bsdimp.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Sep 7, 2008 at 12:40 PM, M. Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> wrote:
> Is there any reason to continue to include both tar and pax in
> /rescue?
>
Maybe for rescue some important file?
BTW, could editors/e3 be include into /rescue?
I think it's ineed to have a text editor to edit some file for rescue.
Because vi(1) lives in /usr/bin.

ps. e3 is a full featured text editor written in NASM assembler.  It is highly
optimized for size.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1f27304c0809062222m724603dat2fb1af63dba5faa6>