Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2013 08:54:45 +0100 From: John Marino <freebsd.contact@marino.st> To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Michael_Gr=FCnewald?= <michael.grunewald@laposte.net> Cc: marino@freebsd.org, Rui Paulo <rpaulo@felyko.com>, FreeBSD ports <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: OCaml 4? Message-ID: <527B4745.5070904@marino.st> In-Reply-To: <527B2DFA.1060406@laposte.net> References: <830ACA3E-9233-453F-A891-2EA0F0B9F2DB@felyko.com> <527A9A9B.2040202@laposte.net> <527A9BB8.5010401@marino.st> <527AA045.7000302@laposte.net> <527AA687.9080405@marino.st> <527B2DFA.1060406@laposte.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 11/7/2013 07:06, Michael Grünewald wrote: > John Marino wrote: >> On 11/6/2013 21:02, Michael Grünewald wrote: >>> It seems dports has ocaml 4.00.1 while I prepared a 4.01.0, if you test >>> it, your feddback would be welcome! >> >> Surely dports could be updated to ocaml 4.01.0 as easily as changing the >> PORTVERSION and regenerating the distinfo file? > > Besides this, there is a minor update of the configure script, you can > get it from > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/173364 Hmmm, I was thinking the holdup was on your end, but it seems from that PR that bf@ is the bottle-neck. The last thing he said (in August) that he was going to work on it, which is 8 months after he said, "I'll take the PR". Has the whole thing stalled? 11 months to get a PR through when the submitter is responsive seems excessive to me, maybe somebody else should take over the PR if bf@ is too busy. John
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?527B4745.5070904>