Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 10 Apr 2007 09:17:16 +0400
From:      "Andrey V. Elsukov" <bu7cher@yandex.ru>
To:        Pawel Jakub Dawidek <pjd@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.org, zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: ZFS committed to the FreeBSD base.
Message-ID:  <461B1DDC.8050009@yandex.ru>
In-Reply-To: <20070406025700.GB98545@garage.freebsd.pl>
References:  <20070406025700.GB98545@garage.freebsd.pl>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
> Limitations.
> 
>   Currently ZFS is only compiled as kernel module and is only available
>   for i386 architecture. Amd64 should be available very soon, the other
>   archs will come later, as we implement needed atomic operations.
> 
> Missing functionality.
> 
>   - We don't have iSCSI target daemon in the tree, so sharing ZVOLs via
>     iSCSI is also not supported at this point. This should be fixed in
>     the future, we may also add support for sharing ZVOLs over ggate.
>   - There is no support for ACLs and extended attributes.
>   - There is no support for booting off of ZFS file system.
> 
> Other than that, ZFS should be fully-functional.

Hi, Pawel. Thanks for the great work!

1. I have an yesterday's CURRENT and I get a `kmem_map too small`
panic when try to copy /usr/src to ZFS partition with enabled
compression. (I have 512M of RAM)

2. I've tried snapshots. Seems that all work good. I have one
question: .zfs directory should be invisible? I can `cd .zfs`
and see it's content, but may be .zfs should be visible like
an ufs's .snap?

-- 
WBR, Andrey V. Elsukov



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?461B1DDC.8050009>