Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2011 10:17:39 +0100 (CET) From: sthaug@nethelp.no To: christer.solskogen@gmail.com Cc: dougb@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org, sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu, imp@bsdimp.com, fjoe@samodelkin.net Subject: Re: WITHOUT_PROFILE=yes by default Message-ID: <20111220.101739.74674744.sthaug@nethelp.no> In-Reply-To: <CAMVU60ZDy48A2uvakW7_BMbfzq3bDBaBCkFSwiaexxChLoFPLg@mail.gmail.com> References: <20111202223716.GA35140@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <5A7C9A6F-34F6-4BEB-AFE7-D6D7C50D7AB2@bsdimp.com> <CAMVU60ZDy48A2uvakW7_BMbfzq3bDBaBCkFSwiaexxChLoFPLg@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > Now all users that want to profile anything need to build their own= custom FreeBSD? =A0That seems even more nuts to me. > = > So that all users that do not want to profile anything need to build > their own "custom" FreeBSD? No. It simply means these users will have profiled libraries available that they don't use. FWIW, I support keeping the build of profiled libraries. Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sthaug@nethelp.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20111220.101739.74674744.sthaug>