Date: Fri, 18 Dec 1998 15:26:37 -0500 From: Brian Cully <shmit@kublai.com> To: Chuck Robey <chuckr@mat.net> Cc: Tony Kimball <alk@pobox.com>, J_Shevland@TurnAround.com.au, freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Where to put java libs Message-ID: <19981218152637.R29799@kublai.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.05.9812181514270.310-100000@picnic.mat.net>; from Chuck Robey on Fri, Dec 18, 1998 at 03:15:19PM -0500 References: <19981218150524.C26461@kublai.com> <Pine.BSF.4.05.9812181514270.310-100000@picnic.mat.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Dec 18, 1998 at 03:15:19PM -0500, Chuck Robey wrote: > On Fri, 18 Dec 1998, Brian Cully wrote: > > Tcl stuff should be in libdata or share, so should Java stuff. Lib is > > definately /not/ the right place for them, its just the de-facto > > standard amongst Linux weenies. > > Not so, it's where *FreeBSD* has installed it for years now. Linux > hasn't got any small piece of blame for that, at all. Regardless of the validity of this statement, my main point still stands. It was a mistake to put the TCL bits there, because they belong in libdata, and likewise it would be a mistake to put Java bits there. -bjc To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19981218152637.R29799>