Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2013 09:44:32 +0200 From: Andreas Nilsson <andrnils@gmail.com> To: sthaug@nethelp.no Cc: Olivier Nicole <on@cs.ait.ac.th>, Olivier Nicole <olivier.nicole@cs.ait.ac.th>, s m <sam.gh1986@gmail.com>, FreeBSD Net <freebsd-net@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: how define network with mask 8 for dhcp server? Message-ID: <CAPS9%2BStfwq309h641hiTGnav=bTWdr5HWdz4evpMqTx6mfx%2BgA@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20130812.071303.74723582.sthaug@nethelp.no> References: <CAA_1SgHWSwm62xsXzas7W0SOtDoLL-0o85%2BdqGeLzDbhb=KWQg@mail.gmail.com> <CA%2Bg%2BBvhvo0Tx0XjyGw7fTV=aribbev1BEh8cUsVLWjxD2d62pg@mail.gmail.com> <CAA_1SgGJdt8h3-5naE32PuuWxX26NhiXietyOsh20Lf73pkrVQ@mail.gmail.com> <20130812.071303.74723582.sthaug@nethelp.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 7:13 AM, <sthaug@nethelp.no> wrote:
> > you're right Olivier, but you know i have a user interface for dhcp and i
> > should handle all the network and ranges which are inserted by user and
> > logically are true. network with mask 8, logically is true and having
> > million available ip address, too.
> > i just wanna know if there is any solution to improve my performance or
> not.
>
> There is no solution with ISC DHCP. I doubt you'll find other suitable
> alternatives, but you're free to try of course.
>
> Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sthaug@nethelp.no
>
>
One thing to try is to have more range statements in the block, like:
subnet 192.0.0.0 netmask 255.0.0.0
{
range 192.0.0.1 192.127.255.255;
range 192.128.0.0 192.255.255.255;
}
Best regards
Andreas
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAPS9%2BStfwq309h641hiTGnav=bTWdr5HWdz4evpMqTx6mfx%2BgA>