Date: Thu, 04 Apr 1996 02:39:01 -0800 From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com> To: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami) Cc: ports@freebsd.org, gibbs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: NO_PACKAGE and NO_CDROM Message-ID: <6270.828614341@time.cdrom.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 04 Apr 1996 02:30:09 PST." <199604041030.CAA05287@sunrise.cs.berkeley.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> * I'm running one right now for a `ports-all' collection and will see
> * how it looks. If it runs less than 10 minutes and doesn't show up as
> * the #1 culprit in top, I'll probably let it live.
>
> Well I don't know when you started it but it just finished. The final
> size was 1294KB. I'd say that's a go, it's smaller than most of the
> sendmails! :)
I agree, especially if we remove all the small collections which
result in some 30 different supscans being run and can hardly be
optimal either.
Anyone object to the idea of ports-{foo,bar,...} going away and being
replaced by one ports-all? Does anyone here even sup a partial
ports tree? I know that I never have..
Jordan
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?6270.828614341>